Fiat Chrysler Diesel Emissions
This case alleges that Fiat Chrysler Automobiles unlawfully installed hidden devices (called “defeat devices”) in certain cars that they sold to the public.
The defeat devices allegedly shut down the cars’ emission control systems outside regulatory testing circumstances. As such, the cars were able to pass emission tests but polluted excessively when driven on the road.
Bosch and its related companies supplied the vehicles’ engine control computers that allegedly housed the defeat devices and are named as defendants in the case. Also named are the dealers which sold the vehicles.
The Plaintiffs allege that the defendants’ conduct breached Canadian environmental, consumer protection, and other laws.
The Court will decide at a later date if the case will proceed as a class action.
The case seeks to represent all persons in Canada who purchased or leased any of the following diesel vehicles: Jeep Grand Cherokees and Dodge Ram 1500 (model years 2014-2016).
- April 8, 2022: The Ontario Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal to the plaintiffs. A copy of the order can be found here. The plaintiffs are seeking leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.
- August 19, 2021: The plaintiffs completed filing their materials for their motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal.
- June 9, 2021: The Divisional Court dismissed the plaintiffs’ appeal of the denial of certification. The decision can be found here. The plaintiffs are considering next steps.
- November 19, 2020: The plaintiffs perfected their appeal of the dismissal of the certification motion. The hearing of the appeal is scheduled before the Divisional Court for April 29, 2021.
- October 16, 2020: The plaintiffs served and filed their notice of appeal, seeking to appeal the dismissal of the certification motion.
- September 18, 2020: The Court dismissed the plaintiffs’ motion for certification on the basis that there was no evidence of consumer harm. A copy of the decision can be found here.
The decision relates to all current and former Canadian owners and lessees of the affected vehicles, except Quebec residents whose claims are being prosecuted separately.
The plaintiffs intend to appeal the Court’s decision. Please stay tuned for updates.
- July 13, 2020: The Court will hear the continuation of the plaintiffs’ certification motion on September 10-11, 2020.
- May 7, 2020: A Case Conference will be held with Justice Belobaba on May 15, 2020, further to the adjournment of the hearing in February 2020; the Plaintiffs will request a continuation and completion of the certification request.
- February 12-13, 2020: The Court heard arguments about some portions of the plaintiffs’ certification motion. The rest of the hearing was adjourned until a future date, to be determined.
- January 23, 2020: The plaintiffs’ motion for certification will be heard in Toronto on February 12-13, 2020.
- October 9, 2019: The plaintiffs amended the claim to reflect problems arising from an FCA recall to re-program the Vehicles’ emission control mechanisms. You can find a copy of the Amended Amended Fresh Statement of Claim here.
- July 2, 2019: Fiat Chrysler (FCA) has settled the class action lawsuit brought against it in the United States about the same diesel emissions cheating allegations. As part of that settlement, FCA is paying its American customers up to US$3,075 in compensation, and performing a software reprogramming to the vehicles’ emission system backed by an extended warranty.
Although the applicable emissions regulations and the vehicles are identical in Canada, FCA has not settled this proposed Canadian class action. It has recalled affected vehicles in Canada to perform the software reprogramming, but is not offering monetary compensation or an extended warranty to Canadian vehicle owners.
As a result of the confusion caused by this recall in Canada as well as the potential legal implications of the recall for Canadians, we applied to the court for an order requiring FCA to send a notice to all Canadian vehicle owners and lessees clarifying the effect of the recall. In its response, FCA confirmed that it would not seek a release from Canadian owners and lessees who choose to take their vehicles to FCA dealers for this software reprogramming. The Court dismissed the plaintiffs’ request.
There is no legal impediment at this time to the Canadian owners and lessees obtaining the software reprogramming insofar as this proposed class action is concerned. However, we are not in a position to advise whether the software reprogramming will have an impact on the affected vehicles’ performance or fuel efficiency.
- April 11, 2019: Certification motion is scheduled for February 11-13, 2020, before The Honourable Justice Belobaba.
- January 17, 2019: The plaintiffs filed the Amended Fresh Statement of Claim with leave from the Honourable Justice Belobaba.
- December 28, 2018: The Superior Court of Justice granted the plaintiffs’ opposed motion to amend the claim. You can find a copy of the Court’s decision here. The Court’s Order can be found here.
- January 5, 2018: The plaintiffs issued a Fresh Statement of Claim by Order of the Honourable Paul Perell of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. You can find a copy of the Fresh Statement of Claim here. You can find a copy of the Order here.
- June 2, 2017: The plaintiffs’ Motion Record on Certification was served on the defendants.
- Amended Amended Fresh Statement of Claim (October 9, 2019)
- Amended Fresh Statement of Claim (January 17, 2019)
- Reasons of Justice Belobaba (December 28, 2018)
- Order of Justice Belobaba (December 21, 2018)
- Fresh Statement of Claim (January 5, 2018)
- Order of Justice Perell (December 22, 2017)
- Statement of Claim (February 15, 2017)
- Notice of Action (January 16, 2017)